Stolen Good: Tempted to Plagiarize by Thomas G. Long

Dr. Ray Van Neste of Union University points out this article from Thomas Long entitled "Stolen Good: Tempted to Plagiarize."

I highly recommend this argicle. It gives much food for thought.

I really appreciate this comment from Long that Dr. Van Neste quoted HERE. It really emphasizes the disconnect between congregations and pastors who plagiarize.

The preacher comes from the pews to stand in the pulpit. Only preachers who deliver their own sermons stand with one foot in the life of the people and one foot in the biblical text. No Internet preacher stands in this same place. No borrowed sermon, however fine, can answer the question that cries out from every congregation, "Is there a word today, a word for us, from the Lord?"

Pulpit Plagiarism: What responsibility do preachers have to make a sermon their own? by Colleen Carroll

(This article was first published in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch on November 18, 2001. The original article is no longer available on the paper's website, so I am producing it below in its entirety.)

Pulpit Plagiarism: What responsibility do preachers have to make a sermon their own? 

By Colleen Carroll 

St. Louis Post-Dispatch 

November 18, 2001


Pulpit plagiarism--or sermon borrowing, depending on whom you ask--is as old as the art of preaching itself. Now, in the age of the Internet, cribbing sermons is easier than ever. But so is getting caught.

A pastor at Clayton's Central Presbyterian Church near St. Louis, Mo., recently resigned his pulpit after confessing to his 1,800-member congregation that he had preached sermons that were not his own. The admission came after church staffers and members recognized some of his sermons as the work of the Rev. Tim Keller, a nationally renowned preacher at New York City's Redeemer Presbyterian Church.

Text and audio versions of Keller's sermons are among the scores of Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist and Hindu sermons or teachings available online. Cregan Cooke, director of communications and media for Redeemer Presbyterian, said the unauthorized borrowing of sermons is "not an issue" for the New York church, because Keller--like many religious leaders who post sermons online--simply wants to spread his message. "All ministers borrow from each other. It's a very common thing," said Cooke. "The only issue is attribution."

Indeed, originality has never been paramount in a profession built around the exegesis of ancient texts and propagation of age-old doctrines. Theological accuracy, inspirational power and dynamic delivery matter more to most religious leaders. Many St. Louis area clerics say they often cull online sermon guides--as well as journals, tapes, CD-ROMs and books--to mold their own remarks.

Brian Larson, editor of Preachingtoday.com, an online portal for sermon materials, sees demand rising for Internet sermon services like his. Just 2 years old, the service had 12,512 subscribers in January 2001. Last week, he counted 17,790. Larson said he has no problem with preachers sharing materials, if the author gets credit and the church accepts the practice. "All preachers are preaching from God's word," said Larson, who is also editor of Preaching Today, a long-standing audio service. "It's not their idea."

The use of canned sermons has plenty of precedents. Some writers, including a few in St. Louis, make their living crafting sermons and sermon outlines for subscribers. Books and mimographed copies of sermons have long been big sellers at clergy conventions.

From Massachusetts to Texas, preachers have been caught delivering sermons verbatim--and without attribution--that they purchased from online and print sermon services. In one case reported by the Boston Globe, a minister lost his job after publishing cribbed sermons under his own name.

Baptist preacher and civil rights leader the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was criticized after his death for plagiarizing parts of his doctoral dissertation and sermons. Many scholars denounced his actions in the academic realm, but defended his sermon borrowing as permissible. "In some aspects of the oral tradition, you hear a number of stories ... that are good but can't be tracked," said Enoch Oglesby, United Church Professor of Theology and History at Eden Theological Seminary in St. Louis. "If it enhances the common good, so be it."

Still, Oglesby--like most clerics, scholars and ethicists--draws the line at the verbatim delivery of sermons that belong to others. Religious leaders who cross that line, and do not credit their sources, risk losing the trust of their followers. They may also preach sermons ill-suited to their particular faith communities, since the canned talks were intended for another audience. "You're cheating your congregation of your own holiness," said the Rev. James Cormack, Catholic pastor of St. Catherine Laboure Parish in south St. Louis County.

Cormack, a Vincentian priest who won the Great Preacher Award from the Aquinas Institute of Theology in 1995, said the occasional preaching of another's sermon is acceptable, as long as the speaker tells his congregation that the work is not his own. But repeated reliance on the words of another signals a problem. A prayerful, hard- working priest can capture his audience's attention, Cormack said, if he takes the time to pray and reflect on Scripture. "In the end, that cuts deeper than somebody who's slick and glossy and doesn't seem to have any depth," Cormack said.

Still, clerics agree that smooth delivery--and a few good jokes, which can be easily skimmed from Internet sites--liven up a sermon. Rabbi Ze'ev Smason presides over Nusach Hari-B'nai Zion Congregation, a 300-member orthodox synagogue in University City. To add to his repertoire of jokes and hone his speaking skills, Smason combs Internet sites in English and Hebrew and recently attended a public speaking seminar. In the age of the Internet and cable television, Smason said, religious leaders must work harder than ever to keep the attention of their audiences. "It's almost as if we're expected or we need to put on a show," he said.

Pressure mounts around the high holidays, Smason said, when synagogue attendance multiplies. At those times, Smason tries to "hit a home run" with sermons designed to draw sporadic attendees into more regular observance. The day-to-day pressures of full-time ministry--visiting the sick, teaching classes, offering marriage counseling--also make life busy for Smason, who said he usually has free time "between 2 and 4 a.m."

Good sermons require a substantial time investment: Homiletics instructors sometimes tell preachers to prepare one hour for every minute they speak in the pulpit. For preachers like the Rev. Jesse Williams, the senior pastor at Washington Tabernacle Church in St. Louis, that translates into 30 to 40 hours of preparation each week for his 45-minute sermons. "In the black church, the preaching moment is so paramount in the worship experience," said Williams, who also teaches preaching at Eden Seminary.

To compose sermons for his Missionary Baptist church, Williams browses the lectionary text, sermon books and commentaries for inspiration. He allows that originality is hard to come by in a theologically sound sermon. "We do all share ideas," Williams said. "But when it comes to composing the sermon, we owe it to the congregation to be original."

Jerry Vines On Pulpit Plagiarism

Jerry Vines has published countless resources over the years to help pastors study and write sermons. He along with Jim Shaddix, who formerly taught homiletics at New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary but is now at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, authored a book on how to write and deliver expository sermons.

That book is called Power In The Pulpit, and is available HERE.

On page 206 of the 1999 edition of this book, Drs. Vines and Shaddix make the following statement:
“Read the sermons that other men have preached on the passage under consideration. Be careful how you borrow material, however. Plagiarism is rampant in almost every aspect of our society. Via the Internet, students and preachers alike now have access to complete research papers and entire sermons with the click of a mouse. Remember that the lifting of material word for word is improper. Be sure to give proper credit whenever you quote another preacher or writer. Jay Adams asserted that borrowing is permissible when you give new organization, new integration, and new expressing to the materials you have read. He suggested that you mix the materials through your own mind, add them to your own experiences, then present them in your own way.”

Audio: Al Mohler - Plagiarism in the Pulpit

Southern Seminary President Al Mohler and Southern Seminary Preaching Professor Hershael York discuss pastoral plagiarism on the Albert Mohler Show.

http://www.albertmohler.com/2006/12/07/plagiarism-in-the-pulpit-stealing-the-material-we-preach-2/

Relevant portion begins at the 11:15 minute mark. You can download the episode directly at: http://www.sbts.edu/media/audio/totl/2006/AMP_12_07_2006.mp3.

Video: Does God Really Want Pastors to Plagiarize?

What is a sermon?

This is a good question for members of a congregation to think about. What do you expect your pastor to do each week as he prepares to deliver a sermon? What elements must a sermon include to actually be a sermon?
 
 There are probably several factors that make up a good sermon, but at its most basic level, a sermon must include at least two critical elements.

1. Sermons must explain a text of scripture.

Most pastors spend years at a university or seminary learning various tools and skills like hermenutics, exegesis, exposition and homiletics*, plus learning basic to advanced Greek and Hebrew, in order to be better equipped to dig into a passage of scripture to explain its meaning.

If your pastor uses a word or phrase in the Bible as a springboard to launch into a rant about some social or political issue, you’re not listening to a sermon. I’ve seen pastors quote a verse at the beginning of a “sermon” and then spend the rest of their “message” talking about issues in a way purely opposite the meaning of the quoted verse. I’ve seen pastors place their Bible on the podium, read a verse, then spend the rest of their time walking around raving about a topic without ever returning to the Bible. This may be a “speech” or a “talk,” but it's definitely not a sermon.

2. Sermons must relate the truth of scripture to the heart of the hearers.

If you have the explanation of a text of scripture without application, you are listening to a lecture, not a sermon.

Hebrews 4:12-13 says, “For the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and of spirit, of joints and of marrow, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart. And no creature is hidden from his sight, but all are naked and exposed to the eyes of him to whom we must give account.

2 Timothy 3:16 says, “All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness.

The purpose of scripture is to expose our sin and train us to be more like Christ.

Pastors must take into account the congregation’s background and situation in order to make the application of a text. Aside from committing intellectual theft, this is one of the great weaknesses of a pastor who plagiarizes. He skips the part of preparation where he applies the text of scripture to the people he shepherds.

It is natural for the congregation of a plagiarizing pastor to feel that their worship services are empty and lifeless. Plagiarized sermons often feel bland and generic. It’s because your pastor is simply relating the application another pastor has made to a different congregation.

In my experience at a church with a plagiarizing pastor, the singing portion of worship had to be extra-emotional to make up for the dismal sermons. The nonbelievers in our congregation were not being confronted with the truth of scripture and the believers were not being fed. The shepherd was starving the sheep.

If this describes your church, I encourage you to speak to a pastor or elder about these issues as soon as possible. 


*Definitions
Hermenutics: The study of interpretation.
Exegesis: The study of interpreting and explaining the original meaning of a text.
Exposition: The process of setting forth the meaning of a text.
Homiletics: The process of writing and delivering a sermon.

What is pulpit plagiarism?

Simply, plagiarism is stealing and passing off the ideas or words of another as one's own without crediting the source. Every school, university, seminary has an anti-plagiarism policy that results in either failing the assignment or the course, or even being expelled. Countless journalists have lost their jobs due to plagiarism.

Why is it that some pastors think they can plagiarize entire sermons without consequences?

The truth is, they shouldn't. YOU can do something about it.

Let me offer a few tips for what to do if you suspect your pastor is plagiarizing.

1. Gather basic information about the sermon in question for your research.

The very first plagiarized sermon I discovered had three main alliterated points. I googled the points and found the sermon. Another plagiarized sermon I found had the exact same unique/unusual title (actually it was part of a three part series) as the original sermon. On yet another plagiarized sermon, I took note of a very specific quote from the pastor (there are 912 Hebrew words in 1 Samuel 17), and it let me to this website.

2. Ask someone else to look at your information to confirm whether this really is an issue of plagiarism. 

There is an old saying that there is nothing new under the sun. It's possible for a pastor to come up with a sentence or an idea that is very similar to someone else. If the amount of plagiarism is small or inconsequential, you may benefit from a second opinion. On the other hand, it if it clearly and totally plagairized word-for-word, you may need to consult another person, but for a different reason. Either way, this is a very serious issue, and the next steps require boldness and integrity on your part. You will need to be certain that you can prove your allegations.

3. Share this information with a second person and plan to meet with the pastor.

The reason for doing this is purely biblical. 1 Timothy 5:19 states, "Do not receive an accusation against an elder except on the basis of two or three witnesses." The reason for this is because of the elevated status of teachers/pastors. With greater authority comes greater responsibility. And it also comes with greater protection. Matthew 18 describes how to confront sin between believers, but for a pastor there needs to be two or more witnesses to validate the accusation.

4. Schedule a meeting with a pastor/elder of your church other than the plagiarizing pastor. 

If your church has a biblical form of church government, it may be the case that the other pastors/elders are aware of this problem and are addressing the issue privately. Part of the reason for multiple pastors/elders is specifically for the purpose of pastoral protection and accountability.

5. Insist on speaking directly with the plagiarizing pastor. 

I would recommend that you along with another witness and the other pastor/elder  meet with the plagiarizing pastor as soon as is convenient. Even if the other pastor/elder wants to handle the issue internally, still insist on speaking with the pastor directly. This will ensure that the issue is actually brought up in case the other pastor is not trustworthy or lacks the integrity to confront the pastor. It will also allow for future discussions of accountability and encouragement with your pastor.

Hopefully this will cause the pastor to repent and ask for forgiveness. Depending on the extent and frequency of his plagiarism, it may be necessary to address the congregation and assess your church/denomination's policy for violations of pastoral qualifications.

6. If your pastor refuses to repent, consult your church/denomination's policy for church discipline.

This kind of confrontation is not fun, but it is necessary for the purpose of maintaining integrity within the Christian faith and the church. If this type of deception is occurring at the highest level of leadership in the church, it is likely there are other types of sin also being committed and ignored.

In my case, the church did not have a biblical form of church government, the pastor refused to repent, and several of the church leaders and deacons helped to cover up the plagiarism. There were additional conflicts and deception going on that were uncovered during this process. These sins were also being tolerated and covered up, so suffice it to say, I ended up leaving the church.

If you can think of another step that should be taken, or if you disagree with one of the above steps, feel free to comment below.